« Discussion MediaWiki:Titleblacklist » : différence entre les versions

De Scoutopedia
Aucun résumé des modifications
Aucun résumé des modifications
Ligne 5 : Ligne 5 :
:However, I deleted two more pages this morning. But it is true that it seems devilishly effective. Good job Egel :)
:However, I deleted two more pages this morning. But it is true that it seems devilishly effective. Good job Egel :)
:--[[utilisateur:Bono|Bono]] [[Discussion Utilisateur:Bono|<font color="#00a000" size="2">✍</font>]] [[Special:Emailuser/Bono|<font color="#00a000" size="2">✉</font>]] -  19 avril 2013 à 14:16 (EEST)
:--[[utilisateur:Bono|Bono]] [[Discussion Utilisateur:Bono|<font color="#00a000" size="2">✍</font>]] [[Special:Emailuser/Bono|<font color="#00a000" size="2">✉</font>]] -  19 avril 2013 à 14:16 (EEST)
:The rules on [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist]] that end with <newaccountonly> block matching usernames. I have just added a rule that blocks all new usernames that contain a number. Hopefully it doesn't block to much. --[[Utilisateur:Egel|Egel]] 19 avril 2013 à 14:53 (EEST)

Version du 19 avril 2013 à 13:53

I'm going to speak english here, I think it will be easier for Egel.

This extension seems to be very efficient, we have no more spam article created. Thank you very much, Egel. I watched for a similar extension about usernames, and I found this : http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Username_Blacklist which redirects to Titleblacklist. Is it possible to use Titleblacklist to block bot accounts creation ? I didn't find username blacklist but it may exist. Or we can have our own keywords, for example : "clean". What do you think about that ? Florian 19 avril 2013 à 13:48 (EEST)

However, I deleted two more pages this morning. But it is true that it seems devilishly effective. Good job Egel :)
--Bono - 19 avril 2013 à 14:16 (EEST)
The rules on MediaWiki:Titleblacklist that end with <newaccountonly> block matching usernames. I have just added a rule that blocks all new usernames that contain a number. Hopefully it doesn't block to much. --Egel 19 avril 2013 à 14:53 (EEST)